Chapter Three.
Abraham Lincoln Takes Control.

As he rode up Pennsylvania Avenue in a carriage with President Buchanan
sitting beside him, Abraham Lincoln, a deeply meditative man anyway, must
have reflected upon the extraordinary circumstances that had brought him
to this momentous day. “Without the assistance of that Divine Being,
who ever attended him (George Washington), I cannot succeed,” he had
proclaimed on February 11, 1861, when he had boarded a train and had set
out on a tour of Northern cities that would last for almost two weeks.[i]
Now, thankfully, Lincoln’s long journey to power was almost over.
Looking spiffy in his shiny black boots, a new black suit, and a
fashionable stovepipe hat, this gangly, newly-bearded, 52-year-old
attorney from Springfield, Illinois, who enjoyed the reputation of being a
skillful orator and sagacious advocate, and who was about to assume the
supreme political office in the United States, had begun his days in
simple, almost squalid, dirt-floored log houses on the Kentucky and
Indiana frontier.[ii]
 |
|
Thomas Lincoln |
Lincoln’s father, Thomas Lincoln, was a powerful, barrel-chested,
gregarious man who eked out a living as a carpenter and farmer.
Thomas liked to spend his few moments of relaxation sitting around the
stove in the local store telling tall tales and sharing bawdy jokes with
the other garrulous fellows who lived in the neighborhood. In
adulthood Abraham Lincoln became a talented storyteller too. “As he
related his yarns, fun danced in his eyes and grotesque expressions
appeared on his face, until all his features appeared to take part in the
performance,” comments one scholar.[iii]
“In the role of a story-teller I am prone to regard Mr. Lincoln as without
an equal,” said William Herndon, Lincoln’s law partner.[iv]
Thomas Lincoln was barely able to write his own name. Abraham
Lincoln’s mother, Nancy Hanks, was illiterate. Of obscure origin,
she spent her days dutifully performing the routine chores of frontier
domesticity. She was a gloomy, low-spirited woman, who often stared
out the crude window of her cabin, tears welling up in her eyes and
tumbling down her sun-soaked cheeks. Her younger child, Abraham, was
similarly afflicted. “Lincoln remained a moody, melancholy man,
given to long introspections about things like death and mortality,”
writes historian Stephen Oates. “He spoke of the transitory nature
of human life, spoke how all people are destined to die in the end--all
are destined to die.”[v]
Like his mother, Lincoln was a fatalist. Although he was not a
church member, Lincoln believed that the destiny of mankind is shaped
ultimately by the designs of Providence.[vi]
|

Nancy Hanks |
Abraham Lincoln, named for his paternal grandfather who had been killed by
Indians, was born on February 12, 1809, on a farm about two and a
half miles from the tiny village of Hodgenville, Kentucky.
“Nancy had about as hard a time as most women, I reckon,” said a woman who
assisted Lincoln’s mother with the birth of her son.[vii]
In 1811, the young boy, his older sister Sarah, and his mother were
transported by Thomas about ten miles northeast to a 230-acre farm where
the soil was a bit more fertile. It was there that Abraham had his
earliest memories. He vaguely remembered trudging behind his father
and dropping pumpkin seeds into holes that Thomas had just dug with a hoe.
Life was difficult for the Lincolns and their neighbors. People
sweated and toiled from sunup to sundown. They slopped hogs. They
plowed fields. They chopped down trees. They split rails.
They drank lots of corn whiskey, and they went for months without taking
baths. Disease fed upon this filth. Lincoln’s mother, her “tongue turned
brownish,” died on October 5, 1818, when Abraham was only nine years old.[viii]
By then the family had moved again, this time to southern Indiana.[ix]
|

Sarah Bush Johnston Lincoln, Lincoln's Stepmother |
Abraham Lincoln was ashamed of the circumstances of his upbringing. The
popular image of Lincoln as a kindly, serene fellow who viewed himself as
a man of the people bears little semblance to reality. “Between us
and the man stands a larger body of myth than surrounds any other figure
in American history,” states Andrew Belbanco in The Portable Lincoln.[x]
Despite the persistence of a southern Indiana dialect in his speech
(he said “howdy” to visitors and “keered” for his friends), Lincoln spent
the greater part of his days endeavoring to put his humble backwoods
origins behind him. He had a fierce, driving determination to
succeed and to elevate his social position. “In point of fact, he
was one of the most ambitious human beings his friends had ever seen, with
an aspiration for high station in life that burned in him like a furnace,”
says Oates.[xi]
As an adult, Lincoln hated the nickname “Abe,” because it did not
comport with his yearnings to be a sophisticated man of ideas and public
affairs. He sent his oldest son, Robert Lincoln (1843-1926), to
Philips Exeter Academy in New Hampshire and to Harvard. These
distinguished institutions bore little resemblance to the so-called “blab
schools,” (all students read their lessons out loud at the same time)
which Lincoln and his sister Sarah had attended intermittently for less
than a year total and where they had learned the bare rudiments of
reading and mathematics. In 1842, Lincoln married Mary Todd
(1818-1882). She was the daughter of a distinguished banker and
slaveowner from Lexington, Kentucky. Not surprisingly, some of her
relatives were horrified by the news that Mary was planning to marry a man
so far below her station in life. They tried valiantly, albeit
unsuccessfully, to prevent the union.
 |
|
Abraham Lincoln's boyhood home in southern Indiana |
Abraham Lincoln first established himself as an independent adult in the
small village of New Salem, Illinois in 1831, where he became a clerk in a
general store. New Salem was a typically raucous frontier town. It
had about a dozen houses and a population of about one hundred.
Hard-bitten farmers, whores and drunks meandered down the dusty street in
front of the store where Lincoln worked. Abraham Lincoln was a teetotaler
Partly a child of the Enlightenment, Lincoln believed that one should keep
one’s mind clear, so that one could grasp and follow the dictates of
reason. Although Lincoln participated in such favorite activities of the
town’s meaner sort as wrestling and obscene storytelling, he also sought
to penetrate New Salem’s more genteel social circles. He studied
grammar and became active in the local debating society, where he
astonished many in the audience by delivering reasoned arguments in his
piercing tenor voice. According to Oates, “Young Lincoln fell in love with
language, with metaphors, with assonance and alliteration.”[xii]
Lincoln was not an effective extemporaneous speaker. He had to
select his words beforehand and write them down carefully.
As a
store clerk in New Salem, Lincoln naturally participated in casual
political discussions with customers who came in to pass the time of day.
People, especially men, liked Lincoln. He was a good
conversationalist, and he enjoyed making folks laugh. “Lincoln was
flexible, pragmatic, with a sense of humor to smooth relationships,”
writes historian James M. McPherson.[xiii]
Always looking for some means to gain recognition and to advance himself,
Lincoln came to appreciate how running for public office might help him
achieve his goals.[xiv]
Like his father, with whom he became personally estranged, Abraham
Lincoln admired Henry Clay and was a supporter of the Whig Party.
Accordingly, Lincoln advocated a protective tariff, internal improvements,
a strong national bank, and favored the gradual freeing of slaves and
sending them all back to Africa.[xv]
 |
|
New Salem, Illinois |
In 1832, Lincoln ran unsuccessfully for a seat in the Illinois
legislature. Two years later he entered the race again, and this
time he won. He found politics exhilarating. Lincoln always
struggled against profound feelings of personal inadequacy. He was
ashamed of his looks and was painfully awkward in his relationships with
women. But on the campaign trail, where he stood on boxes or stumps
and explained his political views, the six-foot-four-inch Lincoln felt
competent and capable for the first time in his life. He had an
uncanny capacity to select just the right words to convey his
message. Lincoln could “hold an audience of fifteen thousand
spellbound when reading from a written address, speaking out in a shrill,
high-pitched voice of great power,” says Stephen Oates.[xvi]
Politics was to become Lincoln’s life-long passion, and he eventually
acquired enormous self confidence as a public official.
Abraham Lincoln enjoyed money and what money could buy. Aspiring to become
a professional man, Lincoln borrowed books from a law firm in nearby
Springfield, Illinois, which would soon become the State capital, and
began teaching himself the techniques of jurisprudence. He passed
his bar examinations and received his law license in September, 1836, and
opened his office soon thereafter. For the next 25 years Lincoln
toured the courthouses in central Illinois, representing clients accused
of everything from robbery, to simple assault, to murder. Moving
from New Salem to Springfield in 1837, where he was to make his home until
he left for Washington, D.C. in February, 1861, Lincoln also continued to
pursue his political career. He was reelected as a Whig to the
Illinois legislature in 1836, 1838, and 1840. In August, 1846,
Lincoln, still a Whig, was elected to the United States House of
Representatives and served a single, undistinguished term. After
returning to Springfield, which had a population of about 5,000, of whom
171 were blacks, Lincoln set his sights on running for the United States
Senate.
Abraham Lincoln was above all else a political realist. Illinois was
a free state. It possessed neither the staple crops nor the
plantation system that made the owning of bondsmen and bondswomen an
economically viable labor system. One cannot help but speculate that
if Lincoln had lived in Mississippi, instead of Illinois, he would have
been an ardent defender of slavery. Worth noting in this regard is
the fact that Jefferson Davis was born in a log cabin in Kentucky less
than 100 miles from Tom Lincoln’s home. “An ironic coincidence,
surely--nothing more--that the two men who opposed each other as chief
executives of a divided nation in 1861 should have their origins less than
a year apart in the backwoods of Kentucky,” write William and Bruce Catton
in Two Roads To Sumter.[xvii]
 |
|
Abraham Lincoln as a young attorney |
This
is not to suggest that Abraham Lincoln was a charlatan or a chameleon.
Evidence abounds that he was widely regarded, and justifiably so, as a
person of high scruples and impeccable character. “Even his enemies
conceded that he was incorruptible,” proclaims Stephen Oates.[xviii]
It is to suggest that Lincoln, like any ambitious politician, had to
express the viewpoints held by a majority of his constituents if he wished
to be elected. David Donald, Lincoln’s preeminent biographer, contends
that Lincoln exhibited “reluctance to take the initiative and make bold
plans” and “preferred to respond to the actions of others.”[xix]
In short, Lincoln was a political counterpuncher. At his core,
Abraham Lincoln was a provincial politician who sought to defeat his
enemies by all legal means available. “It was said he was
transparently honest,” contended Southern apologist E. A. Pollard in
The Lost Cause, first published in 1866. “But his honesty was
rather the facile disposition that readily took impressions from whatever
was urged on it.”[xx]
Lincoln’s
views on slavery were intimately bound up with his romantic notions
concerning the role he believed the United States was destined to play in
human history. To his way of thinking, the United States stood at
the very heart of a great revolutionary epoch during which long-standing
impediments to individual advancement were finally falling by the wayside.
To be indifferent to the spread of slavery into the Western territories,
Lincoln insisted, “deprives our republican example of its just influence
in the world--enables the enemies of free institutions, with plausibility,
to taunt us as hypocrites--causes the real friends of freedom to doubt our
sincerity.”[xxi]
In June, 1858, immediately following the close of the Republican State
convention in Springfield, which had selected him to be the Republican
candidate for the U.S. Senate, Lincoln delivered his famous “House
Divided” speech. In ringing tones he predicted that one day slavery
would expire everywhere in the county, even in the South, or it would
spread like a malignant tumor into the North and the territories. “A
house divided against itself cannot stand,” he proclaimed to a
wildly-cheering audience. Lincoln continued:
I believe this government cannot endure, permanently
half slave and half free.
I do not expect the Union to be dissolved--I do not
expect the house to fall--but I do expect it will cease
to be divided.
It will become all one thing, or all the other.
Either the opponents of slavery, will arrest the further
spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall
rest in the belief that it is in course of ultimate extinction;
or its advocates will push it forward, till it shall become
alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new--North
as well as South.[xxii]
Lincoln continued to make impassioned anti-slavery pronouncements during
the now famous series of debates he held with Democrat Stephen A. Douglas
(1813-1861) in the summer and fall of 1858. Douglas was Lincoln’s
opponent in the campaign for the contested U. S. Senate seat in Illinois.
In speech after speech Lincoln accused Douglas, the incumbent, of being an
accomplice, perhaps unwittingly, in a grand conspiracy to introduce
slavery into all sections of the country, including Illinois. “I
think, that he, and those acting with him, have placed that institution on
a new basis, which looks to the perpetuity and nationalization of
slavery,” Lincoln proclaimed at Ottawa, Illinois on August 21st.[xxiii]
In support of this contention Lincoln cited Senator Douglas’s sponsorship
of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. An anathema to opponents of
human bondage, this legislation had repealed the Missouri Compromise of
1820–21, which had prohibited slavery from those parts of the Louisiana
Purchase north of 36 degrees 30 minutes latitude. According to the
principle of “popular sovereignty,” the people of Kansas and
Nebraska were given the right to decide whether their land would be slave
or free. “The spirit of seventy-six and the spirit of Nebraska, are
utter antagonisms,” Lincoln had declared in 1854.[xxiv]
Further exacerbating Northern fears concerning the spread of slavery was
the decision of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott Case of
1856-57. Headed by Chief Justice Roger Taney (1777-1864) of
Maryland, the Court ruled that Congress had no authority to limit slavery
in the territories.
 |
|
Lincoln Douglas Debates |
Lincoln insisted that his position regarding slavery was identical to that
of the Founding Fathers. In his opinion, the United States was a
noble experiment in popular government which would determine once and for
all time whether individuals could shape their own destinies without
respect to class or race. The Declaration of Independence states
that “all men are created equal.” “This is the electric cord
in that Declaration that links the hearts of patriotic and liberty-loving
men together, that will link those patriotic hearts as long as the love of
freedom exists in the minds of men throughout the world,” Lincoln
proclaimed in July, 1858.[xxv]
Lincoln maintained that slavery must be treated as an evil, as an
abomination. First, it had to be contained and prevented from
spreading beyond the States where it already existed. Second, a
program of gradual, compensated emancipation must be begun in the South.
Lincoln was not an extreme abolitionist. He did not favor the
immediate destruction of slavery. During the debate in Ottawa with
Senator Douglas he said: “I have no purpose directly or indirectly
to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it
exists.”[xxvi]
Lincoln would issue this pledge time and time again. Still, in
Lincoln’s view, the institution of human bondage was incompatible with the
fundamental canons of the United States Constitution and the Declaration
of Independence. Therefore, it had to be eliminated --
slowly but surely. “Now, I believe, if we could arrest the
spread, and place it where Washington, and Jefferson, and Madison placed
it, it would be in the course of ultimate extinction,” he
declared in his first debate with Douglas.[xxvii]
Lincoln argued that the best solution was to free the slaves and dispatch
them back to Africa. “My first impulse would be to free all the
slaves, and send them to Liberia,” he proclaimed in 1856.[xxviii]
According to today’s standards, Lincoln would be considered a racist.
“I have said that the separation of the races is the only perfect
prevention of amalgamation,” he stated in 1857.[xxix]
In 1858, at Ottawa, Lincoln said, “I have no purpose to introduce
political and social equality between the white and the black races.”[xxx]
But in one elemental way Lincoln did believe that black men were the
equals of whites. “Certainly the Negro is not our equal in
color--perhaps not in many other respects; still, in the right to put into
his mouth the bread that his own hands have earned, he is the equal of
every other man, white or black,” he stated in July, 1858.[xxxi]
According to Lincoln, slavery eventually had to be expunged from the
nation, because it denied blacks the fundamental right to receive the
rewards of their own labor. Put simply, Lincoln, a frontiersman, believed
that every man, even blacks, should be able to rise as fast and as
far as their own talents and labor could take them. The “free
labor system,” Lincoln insisted, “opens the way for all—gives hope to all,
and progress, and improvement of condition to all.”[xxxii]
Abraham Lincoln lost the U.S. Senate race in Illinois in 1858.
Realizing that his literary gifts, penchant for rational debate, and
ability to deliver eloquent speeches thoughtfully prepared beforehand
would serve him well as a Senator, Lincoln planned to challenge Stephen
Douglas again in 1864. Several Illinois newspapers did mention
Lincoln as a possible Republican candidate for the Presidency in 1860, but
most political pundits pointed to either Senator William H. Seward
(1801-1872) of New York or Governor Samuel P. Chase (1808-1873) of Ohio as
the probable nominee. At the Republican Convention in Chicago in
May, 1860, however, the delegates selected Lincoln as a compromise
candidate. As was the custom, Lincoln did no campaigning on his own
but left the solicitation of votes to party functionaries who distributed
his printed speeches. His opponents included his old nemesis Stephen
Douglas, the nominee of the Northern Democrats, John C. Breckinridge
(1821-1875) of Kentucky, the standard bearer of the Southern Democrats and
Buchanan’s Vice President, and Tennessean John Bell (1797-1869) the
Speaker of the House of Representatives and candidate of the
Constitutional Union Party. The Republican platform was unambiguous in its
opposition to slavery. It ridiculed popular sovereignty as
“deception and fraud” and proclaimed that the Republican Party would
never allow human bondage to spread into the territories. It
condemned all efforts to reopen the international slave trade and labeled
Southern talk about secession as “contemplated treason.”[xxxiii]
Lincoln prevailed. On election day, November 6th, he received
1,866,452 votes or about 40 percent of the popular vote. He did not
win any of the Southern or border States, but his victory in the North and
in California and Oregon gave Lincoln 180 votes in the Electoral College,
comfortably above the 152 needed to become President. “A good
deal could be said in criticism of a system under which a candidate who
polled only a large third of the popular vote could carry the
electoral college so decisively,” writes historian Allan Nevins.
“Lincoln had not received a single ballot in nearly one-third of the
States, and had not gained a single elector in the entire South, yet he
was now to be head of the entire country.”[xxxiv]
During the campaign, conservative Republicans had urged Lincoln to make
conciliatory statements that hopefully would placate the South.
Lincoln had refused. “What is it I could say which would quiet alarm?”,
the Republican candidate had asked in October. “Is it that no
interference by the government, with slaves or slavery within the states
is intended? I have said this so often already, that a repetition of
it is but mockery, bearing an appearance of weakness.”[xxxv]
The majority of Republicans believed that the secession crisis would
ultimately pass, just as it had in 1820 or 1850. Surely, people of
this persuasion argued, the Southern extremists would ultimately lose out
to those in the South who retained deep feelings of affection for the
Union. “The cardinal error of the Republicans was their failure to
treat the now imminent danger of secession with the candor and emphasis
which it required,” contends Nevins.[xxxvi]
“The good people of the South,” Lincoln said, “have too much good sense
and good temper to attempt the ruin of the government.”[xxxvii]
Lincoln was wrong.
On
three points President Lincoln was unyielding. First, he was
determined to prohibit slavery from the territories by national law.
Second, he would preserve the Union. The President believed that to
allow the South to secede simply because it refused to accept the results
of a fair and democratic election would destroy the principle of
self-government and propel the American people into an era of endless
anarchy. Third, he would hold Fort Sumter and Fort Pickens.
Lincoln would do nothing on these issues to appease the South. There was
in Lincoln the feeling that the fundamental issue of slavery and its place
in the future of the country had to be faced head-on. No more
compromising. No more dilly-dallying. If the South chose to
resist the Republican mandate by going to war, so be it. Better to
fight for the sake of righteousness than to seek a shameful
reconciliation with evil. “Neither let us be slandered from our duty
by false accusations against us, nor frightened from it by menaces of
destruction to the government nor of dungeons to ourselves,” Lincoln had
proclaimed in February, 1860. “LET US HAVE FAITH THAT RIGHT MAKES
MIGHT, AND IN THAT FAITH, LET US, TO THE END, DARE TO DO OUR DUTY AS WE
UNDERSTAND IT.”[xxxviii]
On December 21, 1860, the day after South Carolina had seceded, Lincoln
set forth in a letter to Winfield Scott the policy he would pursue toward
the forts and other Federal property in the South. The
President-elect left no doubt about what he intended to do once he took
office. “Please present my respects to the General, and tell him,
confidentially, I shall be obliged to him to be as well prepared as he can
to either hold, or retake, the forts, as the case may
require, at and after the inauguration.”[xxxix]
In February, 1861, in a speech at Indianapolis, while journeying from
Springfield to Washington, Lincoln asked: “But if the Government, for
instance, but simply insists upon holding its own forts, or retaking those
forts which belong to it, or the enforcement of the laws of the United
States in the collection of duties upon foreign importations, . . . would
any or all of these things be coercion?”[xl]
Lincoln continued to assume
an unbending stance in his inaugural address on March 4th, which he
delivered to a crowd of several thousand on the east side of the Capitol.
“Plainly, the central idea of secession, is the essence of anarchy,” he
avowed.[xli]
“The power confided to me,” Lincoln stated, “will be used to hold, occupy,
and possess the property, and places belonging to the government, and to
collect the duties and imposts . . . .”[xlii]
The President, speaking with steel-rimmed glasses carefully balanced on
his nose, underscored again his commitment to leaving slavery alone where
it already existed. He even pledged his support for a Constitutional
amendment that would preclude Congress from interfering with the
institution of human bondage in the slave States. But Lincoln made it
clear that he would take no part in any efforts to emasculate the platform
on which he had been elected. “In your hands, my dissatisfied
fellow countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil
war,”