Chapter Eight.
The Yankees Occupy Hilton Head and Beaufort.
After the fall of
Fort Walker and Fort Beauregard, the whole of South Carolina and Georgia
lay open to invasion by Federal troops. "The waterborne force
pointed straight at the soul -- if not the heart -- of the Confederacy,"
writes historian Rowena Reed.[1]
Except for Fort Pulaski on Cockspur Island, Savannah was essentially
defenseless against Yankee gunboats moving upriver from the open sea.
Farther inland, also easily approachable via the Savannah River, was
Augusta, Ga., a critical railroad center and the site of a major
ammunitions factory. The southern approaches to Charleston by way of
the North Edisto River, the Stono River, and James Island were devoid of
significant fortifications. General Sherman had approximately 13,000
troops backed up by a mighty armada of invincible gunboats and frigates,
while Lee had to make do with some 4,000 soldiers strung out along the
coast from Georgetown, S. C., to Brunswick, Ga with virtually no navy to
help them. The Yankees, says Reed, had cracked the "thin shell of
the enemy's coastal defense system."[2]
Robert E. Lee
faced a formidable challenge in trying to keep the Yankees bottled up on
the coast and protecting the tracks of the Charleston and Savannah
Railroad, a vital lifeline of the Confederacy. "Gen. Robert Lee has come
to help -- he is not a lucky man," observed diarist Mary Chestnut.[3]
Lee expected DuPont and Sherman to attack him in the very near future. "I
consider we have not an hour to lose," he proclaimed.[4]
Lee was aware that the Federal shallow draft gunboats, called
"double-enders" because they had a double bow and a rudder and paddlewheel
at each end, could navigate in just 8 feet of water and could therefore
steam upriver to within four miles of Coosawhatchie. By
seizing the railroad, the Yankees could prevent the movement of supplies
and troops between Charleston and Savannah. They would then move against
first one and then the other of these two major Confederate ports.
Lee was so concerned about the prospect of losing control of the
Charleston and Savannah Railroad that he urged Confederate officials to
proceed quickly with connecting two railroads that terminated
in Augusta, Ga. As late as February, 1862, he was still urging this
course of action. "I have the honor to call your attention to the
importance to the defense of the cities of Charleston, Augusta, &
Savannah, as well as to the states of Georgia & South Carolina, of
connecting the Augusta & Savannah Railroad with the Georgia or South
Carolina at Augusta," he told Georgia Governor and Yale graduate Joseph E.
Brown (1821-1895).[5]
The Confederacy
was "never able to exert an effective supervision over its railroads,"
writes historian Robert C. Black III.[6]
Part of the problem was technological. Serving sparsely settled
regions that produced minimal traffic, most Southern lines were
crudely constructed. Bridges along coastal railroads such as the
Charleston and Savannah were highly flammable, open pile, wooden
trestles. Most of the rail in the Confederacy was of rolled
wrought-iron and did not possess the strength or durability to
support persistent heavy use. In most instances there was no
ballast beneath the ties. This made track unstable, because the
rails rested directly upon the ground. Accidents were
recurrent. William S. Ashe (1814-1862), after serving as assistant
quartermaster in charge of railroad transportation to the Confederate
armies in Virginia, was killed in September, 1862, on the Wilmington and
Weldon Railroad, of which he was president, when a freight train overtook
a handcar on which he was riding. That same month, Alfred Waddell, a
resident of Wilmington, was traveling by train across South Carolina when
he experienced a "dreadful railroad accident." " . . . two young
ladies sitting immediately behind me were killed and every person in the
car except one was hurt," Waddell reported. He had to walk the last
ten miles to Wilmington, because the engine had jumped the track -- for
the second time on the trip. "The railroad was in a very dilapidated
condition," Waddell declared.[7]
The greater reason for
the absence of a coordinated Confederate railroad policy was the States'
Rights philosophy that undergirded the South's governmental thinking.
"Too many endeavored to restrain the Confederate Government within the
rigid bounds they formerly had prescribed for the Federal Government,"
says Robert C. Black III about Southern politicians.[8]
Dedicated to the primacy of the prerogatives of private property owners
and local political interests, the Confederate Congress drew back from any
action that would have infringed upon the authority of each railroad to
establish its own modes of operation. There was no standard rate
structure or agreement between railroads about the sharing of freight
cars, even when the gauge of the lines was the same. Each company
followed its own timetable and gave little or no regard to the scheduling
of trains on other railroads. North Carolina provided an especially
striking example of the fatal provincialism of Confederate railroad
management. Powerful Tar Heel economic interests resisted the
building of a line from Greensboro to Danville, Va., a distance of just 40
miles, because they feared that it would divert too much freight business
away from North Carolina and into Virginia. " . . . this road is
viewed with almost universal disfavor in the State, as entirely ruinous to
many east of it," proclaimed North Carolina Governor Zebulon Vance.[9]
According to Black, Southern society was "invertebrate and disunified,
incapable of either cohesion or the management of large enterprise."[10]
It was within such a political and cultural milieu that Robert E. Lee had
to operate.
Outnumbered and
outgunned in South Carolina, Lee had no choice but to let the enemy seize
the initiative. No matter how hard he worked, no matter how many
hours he devoted to the multitude of tasks he faced, the Confederate
commander could not render null the simple truth that the Union forces
arrayed against him possessed greater firepower and greater mobility than
he did. Lee poured out his frustrations on this issue repeatedly
during his stay on the South Carolina and Georgia coasts.
"They can bring such overwhelming force in all their movements that it has
the effect to demoralize our new troops,” he lamented in a letter to his
wife.[11]
"The forces of the enemy are accumulating, & apparently increase faster
than ours," Lee told Confederate Adjutant and Inspector General Samuel
Cooper (1798-1876).[12]
The tone of Lee's
commentary on the state of affairs sometimes became bitter and
waspish, at least in letters to members of his family. His inability
to prevent the Yankees from plundering and pillaging the plantations on
the Sea Islands near Beaufort made him especially angry. "But he can
move with great facility & rapidity," Lee remarked in a letter to his son.
The Union commander "brings his steamers, & burns, pillages & destroys, &
we cannot prevent him."[13]
Sometimes Lee's disdain for the Yankees broke through his seemingly
impenetrable persona of civility and gentlemanly deportment. Lee
called Northerners a people full of "malice and revenge."[14]
On one occasion he remarked how smug the Yankees were. "The
enemy is quiet & safe in his big boats," he told his son. "He is
threatening every avenue. Pillaging, burning & robbing where he can
venture with impunity & alarming women & children. Every day I have
reports of landing in force, marching &c, which turns out to be some
marauding party."[15]
The Union
occupation of Hilton Head Island and the taking of Beaufort two days later
did have a sobering impact upon Southern morale in the region. "I
have never so fully realised that we are engaged in a war which threatens
to desolate our firesides," wrote Ella Thomas. Living on her
family's plantation near Augusta, Ga., she heard rumors that the Yankees
had brought hundreds of blacks with them and were about to set them loose
to wreak havoc in the Georgia and South Carolina hinterland.
"There is one feature I particularly dislike," she complained. "In
their company they have it is reported 1000 Negroes whom they have stolen
or who have run away from their owners in Virginia. These they might
scatter through our state and do us some harm."[16]
Mary Chestnut was also disheartened by the "horrible news" that Union
troops had occupied Hilton Head. "I immediately went to Camden to
hear more -- felt overwhelmed."[17]
She believed that the Yankees would soon be in Columbia in the very heart
of South Carolina. North Carolinian Catherine Edmondston understood the
import of what had transpired. "On the 7th fell the
long expected blow," she proclaimed. "Then commenced a wholesale
system of plundering such as we never dreamed civilized nations could be
guilty of." Union troops, she insisted, discovered "household
furniture, books, plate, wine, etc., which they most unscrupulously
appropriated, in many instances loading vessels with private property and
shipping it to N Y!"[18]
Robert E.
Lee drew upon his vast knowledge of fortifications to devise a defensive
strategy to keep the Yankees at bay and away from Ella Thomas's and Mary
Chestnut's door. Lee's approach, as one would expect from an
engineer, was methodical and analytical. The first task was to travel
along the shore and make an assessment of the significance of each
district. He went to Charleston. He went to Savannah, where he
had begun his military career 32 years before. Time had altered his
still handsome visage. "I have a beautiful white beard," Lee told
his daughter Mildred. "It is much admired."[19]
He journeyed to Cumberland Island on the southern end of the Georgia
coast. In addition to fulfilling his military responsibilities
there, Lee took time to visit the tiny cemetery where his father was
buried.
Think about
how Lee must have felt as he gazed for the first time upon the tombstone
of the man who had influenced his life so profoundly but whom Lee had
never really known. He poured out his emotions in a letter to his
wife. "While at Fernandina I went over to Cumberland Island & walked
up to Dungeness, the former residence of Genl. Greene," Lee began.
"It was my first visit to the house & I had the gratification at length of
visiting my father's grave. . . . The spot is marked by a plain
marble slab, with his name, age, & date of his death." Lee went on
to tell his wife about the loveliness of the natural surroundings.
"The garden was beautiful, enclosed by the finest hedge I have ever seen.
It was of the wild olive."[20]
But Dungeness, for all its attractiveness, was also a reminder of
the abominable nature of military conflict. Lee reported that the
furniture was still in the house. Portraits still hung on the walls.
China and silverware were still in the cupboards. But the people
were gone. Like virtually all of their counterparts along the coast,
the owners had fled inland with their slaves to escape the dreaded
Yankees. "I was also at Dungeness," Lee wrote in a letter to his
son. "The garden was beautiful. Filled with roses &c., which
had not so far been touched with frost this winter. The place is
deserted."[21]
Lee's probative
procedures exasperated some of his subordinate officers. His cool,
calculated manner seemed uninspiring and totally inappropriate to some,
especially to the always irascible General Ripley. Governor Pickens
told Jefferson Davis about Ripley's criticisms of Lee and expressed
concern that the relationship between the two men might have an adverse
impact upon military operations. "His habit is to say extreme things
even before junior officers," said Pickens about Ripley, "and this is well
calculated to do great harm to General Lee's command." As for the
Governor, he had nothing but praise for Robert E. Lee. "General Lee
is a perfect head, quiet and retiring," insisted Pickens. "His
reserve is construed disadvantageously. I find him all that a
gentleman should be, and all that ought be expected of a thorough and
scientific officer."[22]
Lee's defensive
plan, which he summarized in a dispatch to Samuel Cooper on January 8,
1862, involved the withdrawal of troops and artillery from exposed
positions on the coast and placing them inland in earthen fortifications
beyond the reach of the Union gunboats but astride the approaches to the
railroad, Charleston, and Savannah. "The farther he can be withdrawn
from his floating batteries the weaker he will become," said Lee about the
enemy, "and lines of defense, covering objects of attack, have been
selected with this view."[23]
Using the railroad as his interior line of mobility, Lee placed troops at
Coosawhatchie and nearby Pocotaligo about midway between Charleston and
Savannah. Telegraph lines, he reasoned, would enable him to obtain
news fast enough to dispatch troops from there to either end
of the line and, if necessary, to send reinforcements from Charleston and
Savannah to other points of major Yankee attacks along the coast.
The essential purpose of Lee's fortifications was to retard the enemy's
advance long enough to give him sufficient time to respond with adequate
strength to hold the Yankees back.
Lee
attempted to safeguard the most vital parts of the coastline between
Charleston and the northern tip of Florida, while relinquishing control of
those sections that he did not consider crucial. "It will be impossible to
find sufficient troops to garrison the whole line of the coast," he
insisted.[24]
Lee was particularly concerned about Union gunboats steaming up the major
rivers of the region, the Savannah, Broad, North Edisto, and Stono.
The width and depth of these murky waterways would allow the enemy to move
farther inland and with greater firepower. "I have thought his
purpose would be to seize upon the Charleston and Savannah Railroad near
the head of the Broad River," he told Cooper.
[25]
On November 26th, Ripley received orders to "urge forward" the
placement of "obstructions to the Ashepoo and Edisto."[26]
"I am now endeavoring to procure chains and anchors from Savannah, and, by
the aid of the rafts as supports to the chain cables, present a very
strong resistance to any advancing boats," another of Lee's subordinates
stated.[27]
To gather the
number of men and artillery pieces he needed to defend critical places Lee
had to leave much of the coastline unprotected. "The guns from
the less important points have been removed, and are employed in
strengthening those considered of greater consequence," he announced.
"The entrance to Cumberland Sound and Brunswick and the water approaches
to Savannah and Charleston are the only points which it is proposed to
defend."[28]
General Ripley disagreed with Lee's decision to withdraw troops some
distance from the shoreline. ". . . it seems to me," Ripley wrote,
"as far forward as we can go with safety from Charleston the better we are
for its defense."[29]
Ripley called Lee's attention to the fact their pulling back from the
coast would subject many of the plantations on the Sea Islands
to plunder and destruction by the rapacious Yankees.
Lee was adamant. He had
analyzed the situation and had made his decision.
There was to be no turning back. "I am in favor of abandoning all
exposed points as far as possible within reach of the enemy's fleet of
gunboats and of taking interior positions, where we can meet on more equal
terms" he told Ripley.[30]
Lee was resolute in his belief that his troops should make their stand at
carefully prepared fortifications away from the shoreline.
Accordingly, Lee ordered the construction of an intricate system of
defensive works on James Island and on Cole's Island at the mouth of the
Stono River. He reasoned that by concentrating men and artillery at
these sites he would have a reasonable chance of stopping Union troops if
they landed at Stono Inlet and attempted to march across James Island to
Charleston Harbor and take the birthplace of the Confederacy "by the back
door." The job was mostly done by mid-December. "The land defenses
around the city . . . are in good state of progress," he told Secretary of
War Benjamin on December 16th. "I hope they will be
completed this week."[31]
In November
and early December, 1861, General Sherman and Commodore DuPont possessed
an overwhelming strategic advantage over Lee and could almost certainly
have advanced inland and cut the Charleston and Savannah Railroad
with relative ease. During this opportune period, however, the Union
commanders directed their energies instead toward fortifying Hilton Head
Island, taking control of Port Royal Island and the port of Beaufort, and
conducting desultory reconnaissance raids on nearby coastal districts.
Lee, by instinct an aggressive commander, was bemused by the cautious
actions of the Yankees. "I yesterday visited Port Royal Sound, with
the view of organizing a light force to cut off, if possible, the enemy's
marauding parties on the islands," he reported on December 2nd. "No
attempts have yet been made on the main-land, nor could I discover any
indication of any movement. The fleet in large force lay extended
across the sound from Hilton Head to Bay Point, perfectly quiescent, and
no troops were visible except at Hilton Head Ferry."[32]
William Lusk also took note of the lack of Union activity. "Such
little excursions give a zest to the dullness of camp," he told his
mother.[33]
There were many reasons why General
Sherman did not take the offensive against Lee in the opening weeks of the
campaign. The purpose of capturing Port Royal Sound was to establish
a base of operations for the South Atlantic Blockading Squadron, not to
capture and occupy the South Carolina and Georgia hinterlands.
Indicative of this truth was the fact that Sherman had been provided with
no cavalry and few pieces of field artillery -- both indispensable
components of any military force expected to advance inland. "I
am inclined towards seizing upon the south end of the Charleston and
Savannah Railroad as soon as I can get the cavalry" Sherman stated on
December 19th.[34]
Sherman maintained that he needed a bigger army if he was to invade
the South Carolina and Georgia backcountry. "We
have now a wide field before us, but we want boats, cavalry, and more
force," Sherman proclaimed on December 10th.[35]
He wanted to attack the Charleston and Savannah Railroad but
believed that he lacked the number of men required to safeguard Hilton
Head Island and Beaufort and concurrently overrun Lee's line of
fortifications. "After well securing
these important points, and establishing a firm base from which to operate
inland, there will not be left a very large force disposable for internal
operations" he advised his superiors. "I would therefore recommend that an
additional force of 10,000 men be sent to this point as early as
practicable, and among them some regular troops, including some companies
of artillery, for garrisoning the forts."[36]
"In order, therefore, to meet the wants of the operations of this portion
of the Army," he wrote on November 27, 1861, "I have to request that as
much cavalry, not exceeding a regiment, ten regiments of infantry, and one
regiment of regular artillery be sent here as soon as practicable."[37]
Sherman was
angered by certain newspapers in the North that were criticizing his
command for its supposed inactivity. "I have presumed to write you thus,
as I am pained to believe that there is a growing distrust among a portion
of the people as to the activity and usefulness of this portion of the
Army'" an obviously disgruntled Sherman proclaimed in a dispatch to
Secretary of War Cameron on December 21st. "The amount of labor
and activity here I would gladly submit to the judgment of the most
enlightened men."[38]
Sherman was convinced that he should focus his attention upon
strengthening his positions along the coast. Learning that the
Confederates had abandoned Tybee Island at the mouth of the Savannah
River, Sherman approved on December 4th the launching of an
extended campaign to establish rifled artillery batteries on that deserted
isle and compel the Confederate garrison in nearby Fort Pulaski garrison
on Cockspur Island to capitulate or suffer destruction.
Sherman
also maintained that he needed a better army if he was expected to launch
a major offensive. Most of his troops were inexperienced and were
not of the highest quality. Discipline was difficult to maintain
among the Union soldiers, many of whom came from the slums of New
York City and Boston. "The general
commanding is pained to know that some of the troops of his command have,
without orders, invaded the premises of private individuals and committed
gross depredations upon their property," Sherman wrote on November 11th.[39]
One lady saw a Yankee trooper try to beat a horse to death simply because
the perpetrator was bored. "The walk through the town was so
painful," she said about Beaufort, "not only from the desertion and
desolation, but more than that from the crowd of soldiery lounging,
idling, growing desperate for amusement and occupation, till they resort
to brutality for excitement."[40]
William Lusk was likewise dismayed by the behavior of some of his
compatriots. "The country for many miles around has fallen into the
hands of ours armies, and, unhappily victors are apt to be ruthless in
destroying the property of conquered enemies," he lamented.[41]
On one occasion Lusk advised his mother not to come to Beaufort for a
visit. "In the first place," he explained, "we have some four
thousand men on the island, of whom the best are long separated from the
refining influence of home, and, in consequence, the two or three ladies
who are visiting here are subject to a deal of coarse remark, to which I
would not be willing that any woman should be subjected, where it lay in
my power to prevent."[42]
The Union attack
against Port Royal Sound had been the most ambitious amphibious operation
undertaken by the United States up until that time. The logistical
challenges of bringing supplies and equipment ashore to support so
sizeable a military force were therefore unprecedented in both scope and
complexity. Even William Lusk, who frequently criticized General
Sherman for being too cautious, appreciated this fact. "What
we still need is a sufficiently efficient organization to enable us to
strike with rapidity," he observed. "Here we are, nearly five weeks
in possession of this point, and as yet we have hardly been able to get
the stores ashore, which we originally brought with us."[43]
"
Complicating the
logistical situation for the Yankees on the Sea Islands of South Carolina
in late 1861 and early 1862 were the large numbers of slaves who flocked
into Union camps. Abandoned by their masters, having been deprived
of all opportunities to develop any sense of independence and self
initiative, and naively optimistic about their prospects under
Federal occupation, most of the blacks were totally unprepared to face the
rigors of everyday life. The Federal soldiers made matters more difficult
for the slaves by accepting the prevailing racial attitudes of the times.
Most had no doubts about the inferiority of the black race and were
generally disparaging in their remarks about the slaves. They are "vainly
dreaming that all toil is in future to be spared, and that henceforth they
are to lead that life of lazy idleness which forms the Nigger's Paradise,"
William Lusk declared.[44]
General Sherman contended that the slaves were "naturally slothful and
indolent."[45]
Another Yankee, brought South to superintend a plantation which had been
abandoned by its owners, also characterized the blacks as a sluggish and
apathetic people. "I am surprised to find how little most of these
people appreciate their present prospects," he declared. "Once in a
while you find an intelligent man who does so, but the mass plod along in
the beaten track with little thought about the future and no sort of
feeling of responsibility."[46]
William Lusk advised his mother to send him clothes that were "as plain as
possible." " . . . anything that has a tinge of red, or yellow or
blue, it is impossible to prevent the negroes from appropriating to their
own use," he explained.[47]
Federal troops
were overwhelmed by the social upheaval that their occupation of the
South Carolina Sea Islands was producing. During the first year and a half
of the Civil War the North had no intention of doing away with slavery in
the territory it wrested from the Confederacy. "From the
highest levels of government down to the common citizen, Northern war aims
at the outbreak of the conflict were thoroughly conservative," writes
historian Stephen V. Ash.[48]
In July, 1861, the U.S. Congress passed the Crittenden Resolution, named
for Senator John J. Crittenden of Kentucky, asserting "that this war is
not waged . . . for any purpose of conquest or subjugation, nor purpose of
overthrowing . . . established institutions but to defend . . . the
Constitution and preserve the Union."[49]
This meant that the United States would respect the property rights of all
slaveowners.
Secession was
totally unacceptable to most Northerners. To permit the Confederacy
to survive, they contended, would assure the eventual ruin of the
United States. Northerners also regarded slavery as morally
repugnant. But they did not seek to destroy the institution of human
bondage where it already existed. To their way of thinking, the
rank-and-file white population of the South had been duped by the selfish
and exploitive actions of a clique of super rich planters into supporting
a rebellion against Federal authority. "The belief that secession
was a conspiracy by an elite cabal dictated a twofold policy: stern
measures against the Rebel leaders, liberation and conciliation for the
mass of Southern whites," says Ash.[50]
Above all else, Union officers sought to avoid any statements that would
frighten the Confederates into giving credence to the notion that the
North would tamper with the South's peculiar social institutions. To
do so would simply prolong the war by strengthening the hold the
planter elite exercised over lower class and middle class whites.
Political
considerations had little relationship to the course of daily events in
the South Carolina Sea Islands. On January 15, 1862, General Sherman
composed a lengthy dispatch in which he described the plight of the slaves
within Union lines. He warned that the supplies of corn and potatoes
left on the plantations when the masters had departed would soon be
depleted and predicted that the bondsmen and bondswomen would be in a
"suffering condition or thrown upon the commissariat of the Army for
support." To assume responsibility for their own welfare and to
relieve the army of the duty to sustain them indefinitely the slaves must
be "trained and instructed into a knowledge of personal and moral
responsibility," Sherman insisted. He requested that managers for
the plantations as well as teachers be sent from the North. "I have,
therefore, the honor to recommend that suitable instructors be sent to
them, to teach them all the necessary rudiments of civilization," he
declared.[51]
\
|
 |
|
Laura Towne |
One of the many
teachers who came from the North to the Sea Islands in 1862 was Laura M.
Towne (1825-1901), a Pennsylvanian, an abolitionist, and a devout
Christian. Her letters, which were never intended for publication,
provide a fascinating glimpse into what it was like to live among the
slaves of St. Helena and the other Sea Islands during the initial period
of Yankee occupation. Hoping to "influence the negroes directly,"
Towne worked tirelessly to make life better for the blacks who were placed
under her care.[52]
She dressed wounds. She distributed clothes. She provided religious
instruction. "I talked of Christ's love for children and how He
would take them to Heaven if they were kind to each other," she wrote in
her diary on May 4th.[53]
Towne was aware
that slaves had stolen items from plantation houses after the owners had
fled. Living in "wretched hovels with their wooden chimneys," the
bondsmen and bondswomen simply could not resist the temptation of pirating
the treasures that their masters had left behind.[54]
Towne reported that the slaves were so proud of owning shoes that they
would carry them to church in their hands rather than put them on their
feet and let them get dirty. One day she entered a slave cabin and
saw a "mahogany bureau, besides other things that said plainly 'massa's'
house had contributed to the splendor."[55]
On another occasion she visited a black family and noticed they they had
covered the dirt floor of their cabin with expensive lumber. The
lady of the house, Towne declared, explained that "after massa left, they
took his boards, floored their own cabins and put in lofts."[56]
Laura Towne was herself the victim of robbers. "I am sorry to say
that I have discovered two cases of pilfering, and the cotton house has
been entered again and again," she reported on May 19th.[57]
 |
|
Statue of Collared Slave |
Although Towne
believed that thievery was immoral, she was quick to point out that many
slaves had suffered extreme physical abuse at the hands of their masters.
One should remember that Towne wanted to believe the worst about
slavery. Many masters treated their slaves well. "I doan 'member
much 'bout slavery days 'cept dat my white folkses was good ter us. Dar
wus a heap o' slaves, maybe a hundert an' fifty. I 'members dat we wucked
hard, but we had plenty ter eat an' w'ar, eben iffen we did w'ar wood
shoes" remembered a black man who had been owned by a North Carolina
planter.[58]
Still, Towne did hear some shocking stories. "If slave don't do
task, they get licking with lash on their naked back," said a former slave
many years after the Civil War.[59]
Towne met a black lady who claimed that her two children had been "whipped
to death." Another woman showed Towne scars on her arms and back "as
high and long as my little finger." The same person insisted that
"she had had four babies killed within her by whipping." A Yankee
officer showed Towne the lash that the slaveowner had used to inflict
these gruesome wounds. It had a large ball on the tip to tear
open the flesh of its hapless victims. "He had the old whip which
had a ball at the end," said Towne, "and he had seen the healed marks of
this ball on their flesh -- the square welts showed where it had taken the
flesh clean out."[60]
One slave explained how a plantation owner's wife had gone about
disciplining her slaves. "When she go to whip me, she tie my wrists
together with a rope and put that rope through a big staple in the ceiling
and draw me up off the floor and give me a hundred lashes."[61]
A former slave who had lived on a plantation near Raleigh, N.C. told the
following story.
Once,
right here on this plantation I saw a Negro man who was sick beat until he
dies because he couldn't chop cotton as fast as the others. Once on a
neighboring plantation I saw two Negro boys hanged up on the smoke house
by the thumbs and beat for leaving the plantation without permission.
Their shirts were so bloody they had to be greased before they would come
off.
Negroes were treated like cows, the weakly ones ruthlessly destroyed. Yes,
sir, I have known of a number of deformed Negro babies being killed
shortly after they were born. There was very little marrying among the
slaves, one big husky Negro being the father of most of the slave
children. Another thing was pretty girls bearing children for the white
masters, thus mixing white aristocrat blood with Negro blood.[62]
Not surprisingly,
the slaves remained wary even after the Yankees came to the South Carolina
Sea Islands. "The negroes . . . are docile generally and require the
positive ordering that children of five or ten years of age require,"
Towne reported one Union official as saying.[63]
When the male slaves were ordered to go to military headquarters on Hilton
Head Island in mid-May, not a few of the black men, Towne wrote,
"took to the woods and were hunted out by the soldiers."[64]
The Pennsylvania diarist admitted that violence sometimes threatened to
erupt between blacks and their Yankee overseers. She told how one
slave, for example, "drew his knife" when a Federal agent insisted that he
devote four hours a day to picking cotton.[65]
One comes away with the distinct impression that all was not as it first
appeared on the Sea Islands during the opening phase of Yankee rule. A
profound tension existed just beneath the surface. The superficial
tranquility produced by massive oaks and luxuriant flowers, by lilting
mocking birds and soft sea breezes, by black children gathering fiddler
crabs at low tide and black women balancing broad baskets on their heads,
could not hide the fact that two very different cultures, each with its
unique strengths and weaknesses, were in a state of profound
conflict. "The negroes are pretty cunning," Towne observed.[66]
Nowhere was the
disdain for black culture more obvious than in the attitudes whites had
about forms of religious devotion practiced by the slaves.
Laura Towne and William Lusk both commented at length about a worship
service the slaves called a "shout." It began with three blacks
moving to the center of a room singing and rhythmically clapping their
hands together as the other participants formed a large circle and started
marching around, waving their hands in the air, bending their knees, and
stomping the floor. The commotion would sometimes last all night.
In Towne's opinion, it was a "savage, heathenish dance out."[67]
"There is going to be a 'Nigger shout' tonight," Lusk told his mother.
He labeled it a "relic of native African barbarism."[68]
Towne was also put off by the cohabitation habits practiced by some
black men and black women. "The men and women living together on
this place are not all of them married," she recorded in her diary.[69]
"Slave don't marry; they just live together," admitted a black woman.[70]
[3]
C. Van Woodward & Elisabeth Muhlenfeld, The Private Mary Chestnut.
The Unpublished Civil War
[6]
Robert C. Black, The Railroads Of The Confederacy (University of
North Carolina Press, 1952), p. 63.
[9]
Joe A. Mobley, ed., The Papers of Zebulon Baird Vance (North
Carolina Division of Archives and History, 1995), Vol. 2, p. 57.
[17]
Woodward and Muhlenfeld, p. 194.
[18]
Crabtree and Patton, pp. 95-96.
[22]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 366.
[23]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 367.
[24]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 386.
[25]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 367.
[26]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 329.
[27]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 330.
[28]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 327.
[29]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 336.
[30]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 394.
[31]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 346-347.
[32]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 335.
[34]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 208.
[35]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 202.
[36]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 189.
[37]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 192.
[38]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 211.
[39]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 188.
[40]
Rupert Sargent Holland, ed., Letters and Diary Of Laura M. Towne.
Written From the Sea Islands Of South Carolina 1862-1884 (Higginson
Book Company, 1912), p. 5. Hereinafter cited as Towne.
[45]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 205.
[46]
James M. McPherson, The Negro's Civil War. How American Negroes
Felt And Acted During The War For The Union (Vintage Books, 1965),
p. 57.
[48]
Stephen V. Ash, When the Yankees Came. Conflict & Chaos in the
Occupied South, 1861-1865 (The University of North Carolina Press,
1995), p. 25.
[49]
Quoted in Donald, p. 307.
[51]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 218.
[52]
Rupert Sargent Holland, ed., Letters And Diary Of Laura M. Towne.
Written From The Sea Islands Of South Carolina 1862-1884 (Higginson
Book Company, 1912), p. 14. Hereinafter cited as Towne.
[58]
Website of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Preservation Foundation,
Inc.
[59]
Belinda Hurmence, Before Freedom, When I Just Can Remember (John
F. Blair, 1989), p. 79.
[62]
Website of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Preservation Foundation,
Inc.
[71]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 417.
[72]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, p. 420.
[73]
Quoted in Edmunds, p. 165.
[74]
Quoted in Patrick Brennan, Secessionville. Assault on
Charleston (Savas Publishing Company, 1996), p. 54.
[75]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, pp. 423-424.
[76]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, pp. 425.
[77]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, pp. 430.
[78]
E. Milby Burton, The Siege of Charleston 1861-1865 (University of
South Carolina Press, 1990), p. 92.
[79]
Quoted in Brennan, p. 78.
[82]
Quoted in Mark Grimsley, The Hard Hand Of War. Union Military
Policy Toward Southern Civilians 1861-1865 (Cambridge University
Press, 1995), p. 127.
[84]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 14, p. 341.
[85]
Quoted in Grimsley, p. 128.
[87]
Quoted in Lusk, p. 149.
[90]
Quoted in Lusk, p. 143.
[91]
O.R., Ser. 1., Vol. 6, pp. 432.
|
|