|
Brandon Blue
History 4000 - The Atomic Bomb
July 02, 2008
Women and the Development of Nuclear Weapons
This writer contends that contrary to popular belief, women made a
significant contribution to the development of nuclear weapons. The
subordinate role that women carried during the time of World War influences
many historians, forming biases on women’s contributions to many war
efforts, including the controversial topic of the war, the atomic bomb. The
role women play in history as subordinates to men, along with war time
efforts often dominated by men, women often tend to be omitted or second to
men when it comes to historical accounts of nuclear weapons.
The United States has always been reluctant to treat women as equals of
men. Historians often focused on the men that have made the discoveries
towards weapons and technologies of war, while other writers over state the
accomplishments of women and form a feminist view. Both interpretations of
this history does not give a reader an equal representation of the events
and people that developed nuclear weapons. Women provided scientific
discoveries to the physics behind the nuclear weapons, direct assistance to
other scientist in discovering the technologies to make the atomic bomb, and
many women provided for the support staff to make the facilities of the
Manhattan project possible.
Historiography
In Remarkable Physicists, a book dedicated to the birth of physics
over a 250 year period, gives a brief biography of fifty-one scientists. Of
these scientists are the people that discovered the physics behind the
atomic bomb. Only three scientists that James mentions are Marie Curie,
Lise Meitner, and Maria Goeppert-Mayer of which his diction in describing
these women is demeaning when compared to the diction he uses for the men.
James introduces the male scientist with quote from well known scientist,
but when introducing the women scientist it is just a brief introduction of
their accomplishments.
Eve Curie provides an intimate and vivid biography of Marie Curie’s life,
outlining the accomplishments and hardships of Marie Curie. Eve Curie uses
her mother’s own records to illustrate Marie Curie and her dedication to the
science, providing a reader with a thorough chronicle of Marie Curie’s early
childhood, accomplishments, and the successes of her husband and daughter
Irene.
Ruth Sime’s book Lise Meitner A life in Physics attacks
historians that have under-valuated women. Sime contends that Lise Meitner
broke the pattern of women scientist before her, stating that most women
worked with male collaborators that would obscure the contributions women.
Sime chronicles Meitner’s life and contributes a portion of her
undervaluation to the Nazi regime, which forced her to leave Germany and her
scientific reputation.
In her book 109 East Palace Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los
Alamos, Jennet Conant gives the readers insight on the secret city of
Los Alamos from Dorothy McKibbin’s view point. McKibbin was an influential
member of Oppenheimer’s facility, as she was the gatekeeper, the personal
problem solver to Oppenheimer, and the connection to the public world to the
citizens of the secret city. Conant tends to reflect upon Oppenheimer
largely in her book, but McKibbin is mentioned as a key figure to
Oppenheimer and keeping Los Alamos together.
Barbara Goldsmith, the author of Obsessive Genius, provides the
more tragic and diligence of the Marie Curie and her daughter, Irene Curie.
Goldsmith contributes the greatness of Marie Curie’s achievements to her
thoroughness and to her husband’s assistance and his prior experience and
achievements in physics. This book accredits a lot of Marie Curie’s success
to her husband, Pierre Curie’s, previous findings and teaching.
Our Mothers’ War Americna Women at Home and at the front
during World War II unearths the history of women that participated in
war efforts of World War II. Emily Yellin suggest that women are under
appreciated in history and her goal was to reveal “the other American
soldier.” Yellin reveals the intricate roles that women played in many
different aspect of wartime America, including one chapter to Los Alamos.
Jane Wilson provides the stories of nine different women
compiled in her book STANDING BY AND MAKING DO: Women of Wartime Los
Alamos. Wilson notes that after Robert Marshak, husband of Ruth Marshak,
received a proposal to compile a human-interested story about Los Alamos and
handed it over to Ruth. Ruth composed the book plan, as Wilson and
Charlotte Serber compiled the chapters, only to have their book rejected by
the publishers that requested such a book. This obvious states the view
point of women in Los Alamos in the judgment of publishers; nonetheless
Wilson and Serber’s book was adopted to provided the view point of women
that aided in the development of the atomic bomb.
Women Scientist and the Atomic Bomb
Women that participated in the creation of the Atomic bomb directly were
few; about twenty women were scientist in Los Alamos.[1]
In 1944 Los Alamos’s labor force consisted of thirty percent women,
approximately 200 workers. Only a reader with a specific interest in
nuclear science or of the atomic bomb may observe the rare mention of a
women contributing to the atomic bomb, yet there are over twenty women
scientist working in Los Alamos, a city responsible for developing that
atomic bomb. There were several scientists working on the Atomic bomb in
Los Alamos, but very few breakthroughs that were noted due to the secrecy of
the Manhattan Project; thus, many discoveries were hindered to the public
until after the World War was over.
Leona Woods, one of the most eminent scientists at Hanford, Washington; she
was a physicist who had worked with Enrico Fermi in Chicago during the first
nuclear chain reaction in Chicago.[2]
Woods situation is what Ruth Sime states women who worked with male
collaborators was an arrangement that gave them a chance to work but tended
to obscure their contributions.[3]
Yellin also states that a few Women Army Corps with scientific
qualifications also served on Los Alamos.[4]
Women that worked with a man scientist were doomed to live in the shadow of
the male scientist, and historians perpetuate this theory as they are
reluctant to bring women out of context of their role during the time. Mary
Lucy Miller was the head of one of the Chemistry Labs at Los Alamos,
[5]
is an example of a woman chemist that research and efforts have been
suffered the effect of historian reluctant to research women scientist as
explained my Sime
Maria Goeppert-Mayer was a mathematics major that changed to physics after
listening to the lectures of Max Born, eventually joined the scientists in
the Manhattan Project that worked within the shadow of another male
scientist, Edward Teller. Goeppert-Mayer responsibility was to separate the
isotope uranium-235 from uranium-238;[6]
this was the key in making the fuel for the first atomic bomb that was drop
on Hiroshima. Goeppert-Mayer states that after the first bombs were dropped,
“she was relieved that her part in the development had been very minor.”[7]
This statement proposes that a role so critical to making the atomic bomb
possible is taken minor, a representation of a woman’s subordination to a
male dominated field. Goeppert-Mayer dealt with the obstacles in her career
partly by identifying with men at an early age and by disregarding the
expectations of the society in which she lived.[8]
Goeppert-Mayer is one of two women to receive the Nobel Prize for the shell
model of the nucleus.
Many women scientist lived in the shadow of male scientist, Marie Curie
lived in her husband’s shadow, but manage to stay respected among the
scientific and historical community. Marie and her husband, Pierre, worked
intensely for their accomplishments. “With rare persistence and skill Marie
sat, day after day, in front of her equipment. She moved only when her back
hurt. Her process is even tedious to describe…”
[9]
This display of determination is what allowed Marie Curie to be respected
among the historic community. Marie Curie’s accomplishments were many, the
phenomenon was by no means the property of uranium alone, and it became
necessary to give it a distinct name. Mme Curie suggested the name of
radioactivity.[10]
The further discoveries can be partially attributed to Pierre Curie for he
followed with passionate interest; he had frequently helped her by his
remarks and advice.[11]
Later the Curie’s indicated the existence of two new [radioactive] elements
in pitchblende…which was called polonium.[12]
In December 26, 1898 the Curie’s communications read, “The various reason we
have just enumerated lead us to believe that the new radioactive substance
contains a new element to which we propose to give the name of RADIUM. The
new radioactive substance certainly contains a very strong proportion of
barium; in spite of that its radioactivity is considerable. The
radioactivity of radium therefore must be enormous.”[13]
Marie Curie’s doctorial study on quantifying radio activity ended up being a
collaborative effort with her husband, who collected more attention giving
that he is the more known scientist. Marie Curie continued to treat,
kilogram by kilogram, pitchblende tediously separating the radium every day
for four years. Forty-five months after the day which the Curies announced
the probable existence of radium, Marie Curie finally carried off the
victory in this war of attrition: she succeeded in preparing a decigram of
pure radium, and made a first determination of the atomic weight of the new
substance, which was 225.[14]
This diligent work from Marie made all chemists bow to her discovery, for
that it met that officially Radium existed.
Lise Meitner, a scientist widely known for her part in the discovery in
nuclear fission, which made nuclear power possible, as well as the atomic
bomb.[15]
Meitner’s contribution to nuclear fission explained the processes that
explained a nuclear reaction, thus allowing one to determine a means to
control a nuclear reaction. Early on Meitner worked in Freitag and
discovered that among the nearly one million alpha tracks in some three
thousand clod chamber photographs, there were a few hundred tracks with two
distinct ranges that were each considerable longer than the normal alpha
ranges from ThC to ThC`.[16]
This discovery revealed that alpha emission was not absolutely
mono-energetic, a fact that had suspected for some time. Rutherford and
George Gamow expanded on her work and later and found gamma radiation. In
the years of 1932 and 1933, Meitner investigated beta-gamma spectra, alpha
particle fine structure, cosmology, gamma scatter and the Klein-Nishina
formula, neutrons, and positrons. Her work spanned almost all of
experimental nuclear physics; she had the equipment, resources, and
co-workers to quickly step in as each amazing new finding was announced.”[17]
Meitner was constantly contributing to the nuclear physics but this was
during 1933 German, and Meitner being Jewish had to emigrate. “In reflection
of the political situations in Germany, this forced Lise Meitner to think
about many things that had nothing to do with physics.”[18]
The circumstances of Meitner’s emigration to Sweden in 1938 made her lose
her work, position, and her scientific reputation. Otto Hahn, Meitner’s
closes friend, has very little credited to her science. In a letter she
wrote to Hahn:
Now I want to write something personal, which disturbs me and which I ask
you to read with our more than 40-year friendship in mind, and with the
desire to understand me. In the report of the MPG there is a reference to a
lecture I gave in Berlin and I am referred to as the “longtime Mitarbeiter
of our president [Hahn]… Try for once to imagine yourself in my place! What
would you say if you wree only characterized as the “longtime Mitarbeiter”
of me? After the last 15 years, which I wouldn’t wish on any good friend,
shall my scientific past also be taken from me? Is that fair? And why is it
happening?[19]
This strengthens Sime’s theory that women that work in collaboration with
men, often get their work devalued. “In Sweden there was no general sympathy
for refugees from Nazi Germany: the country was small, with a weak economy
and no immigrant tradition, and would not change appreciably until the
middle of the war when it became that Germany would not win.”[20]
Shows how the forced emigration would exclude her from fission and her poor
relationship with Siegbahn hinder her work in physics. The only contact
Meitner had with fission was letters from her best friends describing the
breakthroughs happening in their laboratory. From her theory of fission she
concludes:
“When two drops separated they would be driven apart by their mutual
electric repulsion and would acquire a very large energy, about 200 MeV in
all; where would this energy come from? …Whenever mass disappears energy is
created, according to Einstein’s formula E= mc2 and one-fifth of
a proton mass was just equivalent to 200 MeV. So here was the source for
all that energy; it all fitted!”[21]
Meitner found out the energy source that would be harnessed to make the
atomic bomb, although Leo Szilard realized that this energy could be used as
a weapon, his discovery of this idea is more popular with historians during
this time period, for the Atomic Bombs were a brooding idea of military
minds and ultimately were used on Japanese cities with horrific success.
When it came to Otto Hahn’s record he would always understates Strassmann’s
analytical chemistry, and never fail to repeat that physics deemed fission
impossible; thereby delaying the discovery of fission.[22]
With Otto Hahn claiming most of the credit of Lise Meitner and her teams
discoveries, suggest at an attempt to erase her from the history of nuclear
physics. It took twenty-four years for Meitner to be heard in the
scientific community again by placing the uranium investigation in its
physics context. The damage done by Otto Hahn was so great that it took a
theoretical physicist Siegfried Flugge to review the physics behind fission.
When in Sweden Meitner learned the Swedish language and built a small
research group of her own. Meitner published several brief short papers
describing some new radioactive species formed with the help of cyclotron.[23]
Meitner initially felt that there would be a chance to move to Britain,
which she would had prefer, but Oxford Lindermann had the reputation of
being unsympathetic to women, and from Cam bridge there was such a lukewarm
response that she did not thing it was worth following up.[24]
Meitner suffered several forms of prejudice, first off she was Jewish in
Nazi Germany, and mostly as a woman, as men scientist would claim her ideas
and institutes would refuse her entry.
Women as Direct Assistance to Scientist
Within the Manhattan Project the scientist were not the only important roles
to make the atomic bomb a success, many were supporting staff that were
directly assisting the scientist.
Charlotte Serber held on of these important positions at Los Alamos as the
Scientific Librarian. She was in charge not only of reference books but
also top-secret documents concerning the work being done.[25]
This job was critical in maintaining the secrecy of Los Alamos to the public
and for assisting scientist with materials that were needed. Other wives to
scientist usually picked up jobs as clerical work or secretaries, a fairly
typical job for women, “but there was one chief worry. Could she manage her
home here on the mesa and work too? Would her home life suffer? Would her
husband be neglected? Would her children become delinquents? Would it be
any more difficult than working a forty-eight-hour week in a city?”[26]
This concern coming from Serber instills to the reader that despite the war
effort going on in Los Alamos, women were still suppose to maintain their
duties as a woman to the household, subjugating women to subordinate role of
men. Looking at the history, unless a woman in a position had direct
connection with a scientist she had little hope in being recognized in her
duties. Many women such as Serber found the tech area anything but
conventional. Everything was new and different and frantic.[27]
Serber did her job well and did what she was told, maintaining the secrecy
of Los Alamos and providing scientist with their reference materials as the
scientific Librarian.
The tech area in Los Alamos consisted of wives of young physicists and
chemists. The force of social pressure and the obvious need for all the
hands, trained or untrained, brought most of them rapidly onto the payroll.
They came mostly as secretaries, typist, or clerks. Some came as
technicians, librarians, computers, or draftsmen, and very few as scientist.[28]
Suggests that Los Alamos did not intend to recruit a large number of women
at first, but it turned out that wives were willing to work. These women
become the framework that was to hold Los Alamos together, and provide the
scientist with the assistance need to commit to their work and allow the
government to maintain the self-sufficient town of secrecy.
Women Army Corps provided many scientists with assistants for
they provided extra bodies to fill in positions that would be normally be
taken by men. “More than 400 Women Army Corps served on the Manhattan
Project in Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Hanford, Washington; New York City; and Los
Alamos. Most worked as clerks and drivers, but some were also scientist and
took on responsibility in the labs.”[29]
Yellin gives an approximation of how many women that served in the labs as
assistants to scientist throughout the Manhattan Project. The Women Army
Corps were mostly assigned cleric jobs, giving them the image of just
glorified secretaries to a secret project of America. The largest movement
for women on the home front, Women Army Corps, was also cast in the shadow
of men’s work on the Manhattan Project sites.
Women as support roles of the Manhattan Project
Women took clerical jobs or other domestic jobs that were critical to the
operation of these secrete facilities. These positions were teachers, town
council members, secretaries and various other positions that were needed to
make these secrete cities function.
Alice Smith a member of the town council and history teacher at Los Alamos
participated in the magnificent powers that embodied the Town Council of the
Mesa.[30]
At first the Town Council of Los Alamos failed due to compromise of military
authority, but later when civilian cooperation was needed, the military
leaders sought to appease to the citizens with the Town Council again. A
representative from the Post Command was required to attend and provided a
bridge between the military and civilian populations. This was necessary
because bylaws and election rules were always changing; as reliance on the
council was intermediary increased, it tried to make itself more fully
representative.[31]
The council was critical to bringing together educated scientist and
military administration together, and a chance to allow women to play in
this critical role. The atomic bomb might not yet have been completed
without the framework provided by the military we are well aware, but the
civilians who have left Los Alamos are sure that they prefer to live
permanently under that clumsier system represented by the spontaneous, if at
times unproductive, leadership of the Town Council.[32]
The town council covered issues in Los Alamos from social gatherings,
housing issues, food problems, and maid services. The later was necessary
so women can contribute to the work of the atomic bomb if they had held a
position with a scientist. “Hanni Brescher, a mathematician trained to deal
with more abstruse topics, applier herself to setting up categories. To
distinguish between a full-time, a two-thirds-time, or half-time working
woman was simple, but was one two-year-old male equal in wear, tear, and
washing to two five- and seven-year-old females?”[33]
The demand to provide in house assistance to working women was extremely
high, for that most women had down some sort of job to assist the community.
The town council could on make recommendations to the military
administration; it was scarcely a potent force. However, it was the
necessary outlet for steam when things became too impossible. It did a great
deal of good, too. Particularly in the beginning, elections were attended
by considerable excitement.[34]
Reveals the necessity of the council by providing a connection between
civilians and military that was often an outlet for the civilians to
understand the military post setting.
One job that had to be filled, giving the nature of these
facilities, were teaching positions. According to Marshak the teaching
staff for the large elementary section and the small high school section was
recruited form women already on the hill whenever possible.[35]
Jane S Wilson and Charlie Masters were both teachers, English and Spanish
respectively. When it came to maid service women who taught school had
priority, for if they stayed home with a sick child it created more general
dislocation than the absence of one laboratory assistant.[36]
Wilson opinion of teachers can be regarded as exalted, but the actions of
the council reinforce the importance of having teachers at Los Alamos.
Ruth Marshak, another teacher at Los Alamos and worked in the
housing offices. She recounts the social cleavage between the military and
the scientific personal and the scientist positions on an army post.
As stated by Yellin, more than a hundred were nurses, teachers,
secretaries or clerks;[37]
all critical to maintain Los Alamos as a functioning research town. For a
town to survive and maintain itself from the outside normal word, it had to
vastly self-sufficient and provide the public services that were required to
perpetuate themselves. Wives that travelled with their husband found
themselves being employed by Los Alamos to fulfill such jobs. If the wives
were unwilling to perform such task, the delay to employ such people may of
lead to an bloody evasion on Japan.
One of the most powerful and influential women that worked in
Los Alamos was Dorothy McKibbin, admirer of Oppenheimer, his secretary and
gatekeeper to Los Alamos. “She became known as Oppenheimer’s loyal recruit,
his most inspired hire, and the indispensable head of the Sante Fe office.”[38]
Is Conant’s description of McKibbin’s work ethic, which Oppenheimer was
attracted to when he interviewing her. She would become one of few
civilians with security clearance and would come to know everyone involved
in the Manhattan Project.
McKibbin was surprised at her position as she found it somewhat
unbelievable that all these top-notch scientist would need her assistance.[39]
As scientist arrived in Santa Fe, McKibbin would be the first person they
would come into contact with, and her calm demeanor would allow her to take
control of the pandemonium. Everything at Los Alamos was need-to-know, and
McKibbin happened to know every road, pueblo, village, rancher, shopkeeper,
carpenter, and craftsman for miles around. McKibbin was far more valuable
than any secretary, providing a reliable research to the atomic bomb
research.
McKibbin’s was handed a second kind of task, and this would be
the several civil and domestic problem solving activities Oppenheimer would
assign to her frequently. “Invariable, one of the bus drivers would be
given a summons for blocking the road and creating a Hazard if the fire
trucks needed to pass in a hurry. Worst yet, the physicists, many of whom
came from abroad and were always driving on the wrong side of the road,
would be ticketed and would come into her office waving their hands and
protesting loudly. Dorothy would then have to trot round to the local
magistrate… plead with him to tear up the tickets and set things right with
the town authorities.”[40]
Examples how McKibbin’s natural ability to solve problems but her initiative
and passion she had to the development of the Manhattan Project.
Oppenheimer relied on Dorothy to deal with the more disgruntled
wives—to listen to their troubles and sorrows, provide sound advice, and
find ways to make their life at Los Alamos a little easier.[41]
McKibbin not only provided advice to disgruntled wives and civil disputes
but she was the projects unofficial den mother. “She reassured skittish
young faculty wives, who had never spent a day in the wilderness before,
that there was little change they would find a rattle snake in their shoe,
and promised that the project’s tall fences would keep out the coyotes they
herd howling at night…She told them the Rio Grande was usually too muddy to
swim in, but the cool Santa Cruz Reservoir was less than a hour’s drive and
would make a nice Sunday outing.”[42]
Mc was also the only name that outside banks would accept endorsements on
checks with, McKibbin’s role to women would be a tactical one that
Oppenheimer would assign to keep the wives happy, and in turn keep the
scientist at Los Alamos.
McKibbin was also chosen by Oppenheimer to help brighten the
atmosphere of Los Alamos, as people left her office with greater cheer than
with they entered. “McKibbin was warm, steady, and understanding and helped
people come around to the idea that as a war time assignment, Los Alamos was
not the worst place to be.”[43]
Mckibbin naturally calmed the women down in Los Alamos, keeping more and
more scientist contempt with their assignment at Los Alamos.
Even after the creation of the atomic bomb at Los Alamos,
McKibbin maintained her role as a go-between, and send word that two dozen
scientist and their wives had been invited to a diner, and posting sign-up
sheets on the bulletin board of the ALAS office.[44]
Her attitude and demeanor would forever remember as the forefront of Los
Alamos, her name would synonymous with 109 East Palace
Women responsible for security
The secrecy of Los Alamos provided several women with the potential to leak
this out to other sources. McKibbin was probably the biggest risk of a
potential leak, as she had the most outside contact than anybody within Los
Alamos as she was the gatekeeper for both. The thought never crossed
McKibbin for her, when Fuchs admitted; she was frustrated at his betrayal.
McKibbin screened, fingerprinted, and issued passes to the dozens of pueblo
women and men who served on the Hill as maids and janitors, waitresses and
cooks.”
[45]
Is a demonstration McKibbin’s role as a security personnel and her
connection to the outside. McKibbin also help screened hundreds of
applicants, some of whom had packed their families into trailers and
traveled across the state on the rumor of good wages.[46]
McKibbin was definitely a very useful person for Los Alamos, since she had
to do with everything and everything that had to go to and from the city.
Women accounts often mention of the tenacious rules that were in place of
for security of Los Alamos. Jane Wilson accounts when she had met an
acquaintance from college; she recalled that even her situation was against
the rules.[47]
Wilson unaware of this causal offer to have Coke by her acquaintance was
violating the security rules, went anyways. “A moments’s slip and I,by
nature labbermouth, felet that I would find myself hurtling into the graping
entrance to hell. It was relief to say goodbye. Then, like a child
confessing that she had been naughty, I reported my social engagement to the
Security Officer. Living at Los Alamos was something like living in jail.”
[48]Another
security measure that Yellin accounts for was the changing of the title
scientist to engineers. “The most famous of the scientist had to use false
name and have bodyguards when they traveled outside of Los Alamos.”
[49]
Women of Los Alamos tend to see the security measures as interesting, but
still abided by them. Women provided a large security risk in the vision of
the government, but these women used a lot of composure and discipline in
their everyday lives to preserve the secrecy of Los Alamos.
Maintaining the secrecy of Los Alamos was serious to Oppenheimer, he would
send out women to make up rumors in Santa Fe. He was concerned of the loud
booms that Santa Feans were beginning to hear in the mornings, and he wanted
Charlotte Serber to spread the rumber that they were testing an electric
rocket. Serber accounts specific directions from Oppenheimer:
Talk. Talk too much. Talk as if you had too many drinks. Get people to
eavesdrop. Say a number of things about us that you are not supposed to. Say
the place is growning. Finally, and I don’t care how you manage it; say we
are building an electric rocket. No one is to be told of this assignment.
If you are successful, you will be reported on in Santa Fe and by other Los
Aalamosites who overhear you. You will be protected if you get into troupe,
but for the moment it is a secret mission.
Serber went out and did this, but only to fail miserably at
spreading the rumor. This shows how Oppenheimer felt about women and their
ability to gossip, but also the trust he had with giving her this secret
mission. Her counterespionage soon was forgotten, but there was still plenty
to do.
Laura Fermi, wife of Enrico Fermi, worked part-time in the Tech
Area and was aware of her husband’s work, although, like everyone else, she
and her husband did not discuss much of what he did at Los Alamos until
after the bomb had been dropped on Hiroshima.[50]
“Women wanted to know. Everything. At once. But many things could not be
said even then, cannot be said now… Their first bewilderment turned into
immense pride in their husbands’ achievement and, to a lesser degree, in
their own share in the project.”[51]
Is the reaction Enrico Fermi had felt from the wives of Los Alamos, he even
noticed how women had a significant impact in providing and developing the
atomic bomb.
Phyllis Fisher was aware of all the security measure going
around, but she was unaware of why they were in place. She thought some
policies were strange and unnecessary as that only a few members of the
Manhattan Project knew that they were building the Atomic Bomb. In a dinner
conversation that took her husband’s reaction to her by surprised. “I asked
in bantering tone, ‘Well, how about Uranium fish…?’ I never finshed finished
‘Fisher’ because a red-faced, furious Leon was roaring at me, demanding that
I never use that word again.”[52]
Jane Wilson, one of the first wives at Los Alamos, realized how important
the community was, and the efforts they were working. “…We women realized
that we were part of something a great deal bigger than ourselves… We were a
secret project, probably the most secret project which has ever existed in
the United States. That one fact dominated our existence.”[53]
This great project employing many women, Wilson noticed that women provided
for it and she still felt the women’s role was insignificant. The reader
can attribute this to the subordinate role that women have accepted in this
time.
To summarize, women played many roles in contributing to nuclear weapons
during World War II. The scientist; Marie Curie, Lise Meitner, and Maria
Goeppert-Mayer, all made revolutionary discoveries on the physics that made
the atomic bomb possible. Unfortunately circumstances for Meitner she could
not publically announce her discoveries, while Curie and Goeppert-Mayer
worked with male collaborators that received most of the credit for their
works. Many other women, mostly wives and women army corps, provided the
necessary support staff to assist the many scientist that were assigned to
the Manhattan Project. These women were the frame work that scientist
lacked to keep the project a success. Other women often picked up the jobs
within Los Alamos to maintain secrecy by keeping Los Alamos
self-sustaining. These women picked up jobs such as secretaries, town
council members, and as teacher, filling all the necessary positions that
were normally taken by men or scientist. This established Los Alamos as a
city. The upmost important objective of the Manhattan Project besides
creating the atomic bomb was security, which Dorothy McKibbin and other
women help maintained with their counterespionage, security screening, and
excising their self discipline. All of these roles have been the integrated
with the making of the Atomic Bomb to make it successful are just as
important as the scientist the physics and chemistry together to make the
atomic bomb, which eventually and ultimately ended World War II.
Bibliography
Conant,
Jennet. 109 East Palace Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret City of Los
Alamos. New York: Simon & Schuster. 2005
Curie, Eve.
Madame Curie: A Biography. Translated by Vincent Sheean. New York:
The Literary Guild of America, Inc., 1937.
Goldsmith,
Barbara. Obsessive Genius: The inner world of Marie Curie. New York:
W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2005
James, Ioan.
Remarkable Physicists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2004.
Sime, Ruth
Lewin. Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics. Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1996
Wilson,
Jane. STANDING BY AND MAKING DO Women of Wartime Los Alamos. New
Mexico: The Los Alamos Historical Society, 1988.
Yellin,
Emily. Our mothers’ war: American Women at Home and at the Front during
World War II. New York: Free Press. 2004
[1]
Yellin, Emily. Our mothers’ war: American Women at Home and at the
Front during World War II. (New York: Free Press, 2004) 367
[3]
Sime, Ruth Lewin. Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics. (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1996.) viii
[4]
Yellin, Emily. Our mothers’ war: American Women at Home and at the
Front during World War II. (New York: Free Press, 2004) 368
[6]
James, Ioan. Remarkable Physicists. (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2004) 367
[9]
Goldsmith, Barbara. Obsessive Genius: The inner world of Marie Curie.
(New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2005) 73
[10]
Curie, Eve. Madame Curie: A Biography. Translated by Vincent
Sheean. (New York: The Literary Guild of America, Inc., 1937) 156
[16]
Sime, Ruth Lewin. Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics. (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1996) 114
[23]
James, Ioan. Remarkable Physicists. (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2004) 240
[25]
Sime, Ruth Lewin. Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics. (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1996) 56
[26]
Yellin, Emily. Our mothers’ war: American Women at Home and at the
Front during World War II. (New York: Free Press, 2004) 368
[27]
Wilson, Jane. STANDING BY AND MAKING DO Women of Wartime Los
Alamos. (New Mexico: The Los Alamos Historical Society, 1988) 71
[29]
Yellin, Emily. Our mothers’ war: American Women at Home and at the
Front during World War II. (New York: Free Press, 2004) 370
[30]
Wilson, Jane. STANDING BY AND MAKING DO Women of Wartime Los
Alamos. (New Mexico: The Los Alamos Historical Society, 1988) 73.
[37]
Yellin, Emily. Our mothers’ war: American Women at Home and at the
Front during World War II. (New York: Free Press, 2004) 368
[38]
Conant, Jennet. 109 East Palace Robert Oppenheimer and the Secret
City of Los Alamos. (New York: Simon & Schuster. 2005) 22
[47]
Yellin, Emily. Our mothers’ war: American Women at Home and at the
Front during World War II. (New York: Free Press, 2004) 365
[52]
James, Ioan. Remarkable Physicists. (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2004) 360
|